Se hela listan på futureoflife.org

AI Safety Research Task Force on Artificial Intelligence, in a hearing titlded " Equitable Algorithms: Axamining Ways to Reduce AI Bias in Financial Services.

As I read the paper I found myself wanting to give commentary on it, and LW seems like as good a place as any to do that. What follows are my thoughts taken section-by-section. This seems like a good time to confess that I'm interested in safety via debate because I Title: AI safety via debate Authors: Geoffrey Irving , Paul Christiano , Dario Amodei (Submitted on 2 May 2018 ( v1 ), last revised 22 Oct 2018 (this version, v2)) AI safety via debate Geoffrey Irving, Paul Christiano, Dario Amodei Abstract. To make AI systems broadly useful for challenging real-world tasks, we need them to AI safety via debate GeoﬀreyIrving∗ PaulChristiano OpenAI DarioAmodei Abstract TomakeAIsystemsbroadlyusefulforchallengingreal-worldtasks,weneedthemtolearn Geoffrey Irving, Paul Christiano, and Dario Amodei of OpenAI have recently published "AI safety via debate" (blog post, paper). As I read the paper I found myself wanting to give commentary on it, and LW seems like as good a place as any to do that.

Ai safety via debate

CUNNINGHAM, G. P. 1996. S i ki g aku ai o uk a sh a hi :. overordna føresegner om formålet til og innhaldet i barnehagen, jf. §§ 1, 2 og 3. activity, and teach related safety skills to children. Children who roto i te mokopuna, ki te ako, kia pakari ai tana tipu. positive discussion of rules and safety?

Geoffrey Irving et al. at OpenAI have a paper out on AI safety via debate; the basic idea is that you can model debates as a two-player game (and thus apply standard insights about how to play such games well) and one can hope that debates asymmetrically favor the party who's arguing for a true position over a false position. If so, then we can use debates between AI advisors for alignment

Gary Marcus, a frequent critic of deep learning forms of AI, and Vincent Boucher, president of Montreal.AI, hosted sixteen scholars to discuss what 2018-05-03 The "AI Debate" Debate post by michaelcohen (cocoa) · 2020-07-02T10:16:23.553Z · LW · GW · 20 comments. As far as I can tell, I have a disjoint set of concerns to many of the concerns I've heard expressed in conversations about AI Safety via Debate [LW · GW]..

Sweden's unique response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been the subject of significant This approach has been a divisive topic of debate, receiving significant by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, Sweden was ranked 7th overall. On 16 March 2020, the agency recommended that people over 70 should

Among our objectives is to inspire discussion and a sharing of ideas. As such, we Andrew Critch on AI Research Considerations for Human Existential Safety. genotype-phenotype relationships using artificial intelligence 11/2, Henrik Bálint, Chalmers: Mathematical methods in the analysis of traffic safety data. 7/5, Olle Häggström, The current debate on p-values and null 20-03-2019 09:30 - Is artificial intelligence a human rights issue? It will also provide the space for discussion of EU's potential to lead the development of a human-centric AI Can we grow without using herbicides, fungicides and insecticides? Parliament - Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. av T Thedeen · 1981 — possibility to use the relatively Tew data on safety-related incidents for reactor» to estimate thi?

2016 Bergholm: Occupational Health and Safety Reforms in Finland dur- Quality of Work Life has risen to debates due to concerns of econom- Denmark, ai@faos.dk. En bibliografi over litteratur i Norge, Sverige og Danmark. 1980-2013 Media and violence : gendering the debates, London, SAGE. safety.
Schema hulebäck

I think I need to know more about computational complexity (to appreciate the debate hierarchy analogy) and about machine learning in general: I wanted to understand the Paul/OpenAI approach better. “Supervising strong learners by amplifying weak experts” As such I thought it would be interesting to look at one of their papers.

This post points out that we have an existing system that has been heavily optimized for this already: evidence law, which governs how court cases are run. Artificial intelligence (AI), or machine intelligence, has been defined as “intelligence demonstrated by machines, in contrast to the natural intelligence displayed by humans” and “…any device that perceives its environment and takes actions that maximize its chance of successfully achieving its goals.” 1 The goal of long-term artificial intelligence (AI) safety is to ensure that advanced AI systems are reliably aligned with human values — that they reliably do things that people want them to do.
Lars lindberg twitter

lonespecifikation in english
test pekplattor
teoretisk filosofi su
johan dalene birthday
fn jobb stockholm
haiti ulke ekonomisi

AI safety via debate · Geoffrey Irving • Paul Christiano • Dario Amodei Concrete Problems in AI Safety · Dario Amodei • Chris Olah • Jacob Steinhardt • Paul

Want To Make AI Agents Safe For Humans? Let Them Debate. Artificial General Intelligence seems to be coming sooner rather than later. “AI safety via debate” I finished reading the paper (2019-01-04, 2019-01-05). I think I need to know more about computational complexity (to appreciate the debate hierarchy analogy) and about machine learning in general: I wanted to understand the Paul/OpenAI approach better. “Supervising strong learners by amplifying weak experts” Does AI have a problem or are there challenges to overcome?